Telex Airman 750 Headset - Adding To Realism With Real Parts

oem telex 750 headset

To quieten some of the ambient sounds (dogs barking), I use a David Clark aviation headset (model H10 13-S) which is a left over from when I did my ]private pilots license (PPL).  This particular headset is a marvel of engineering and works exceptionally well for real world flying and simulator use.

Recently, I saw for sale in a wrecking yard, an airliner style Telex Airman 750 headset.  The price was $30.00 including freight from the USA to Australia.  To be honest, I wasn’t expecting too much – after all, what does one get for $30.00 these days!  I was pleasantly surprised when I opened the FEDEX sachet and an almost brand new headset, equipped with boom mike and tell-tail aviation style audio connectors and cable, fell onto the floor.  The foam ear pieces were still good condition, as was the small clip that attached the cable to your collar (to stop the cable from snagging).

After plugging in the headset to the Flight Sound X Adapter (click to see earlier review), I was even more surprised when the headset worked!  Sounds were crisp and easy to hear and the weight of the headset minimal.  The boom mike relayed my voice more than adequately across the network to VATSIM.

Using real aircraft parts adds to the realism of flight simulator; a headset being just one item.  I guess bargains still do exist.

Striving For Realism - MCP, EFIS - AFDS & MIP Lighting

737-700 flightdeck. air alaska (image copyright)

One aspect that everyone strives for when building a flight deck is authenticity.   We try to mimic the real flight deck whenever possible.    This isn’t possible with everything, and different people have varying perceptions to what is a suitable aesthetic compromise.   Equally, flight simmers become fixated with certain aspects of their flight deck. 

I know simmers who fastidiously try to replicate the switches of their overhead to replicate the real B737 switches, or try to mould their glare shield so they fit and look “just right”.  I have always been fixated on the MCP unit; I wanted the unit to mimic the appearance of the real unit as much as possible.

I was a little disappointed when I discovered that the CP Flight MCP and EFIS unit I was using, did not fit snug into the FDS MIP. There was small vacant gap along the edge of the unit when fitted into the MIP.  Further, at certain angles the MIP and AFDS flood lighting could be seen along the edge of the MCP.  I thought the latter was particularly unrealistic.  I was incorrect….

I recently came across a selection of photographs taken inside the flight deck of an Alaska Airlines B737-700 (image above).  I was very surprised (if not pleased) to observe that the MCP and EFIS unit had a gap around the edge of the unit and the MIP and AFDS flood lighting could be seen shining along the edge of the MCP unit - exactly the same as in the simulator.

I now can sleep soundly knowing that what I look at in the simulator is very similar to that of a real aircraft.  :) just kidding - I can sleep anywhere.